_________________
Once I thought I was wrong, but then I realized I was mistaken.

7/27/2008 4:56:41 AM Scorpio whats the usual rate of peasants leaving after experiencing land loss?
7/27/2008 4:56:55 AM Acerac 40% of the amount you're above max per hour

_________________
I don't have a dirty mind, I have a sexy imagination. XD

I'm very impressed, how did someone like him figure this out.

An easier estimate would be
Let L = your land, M = max improvement value, P = points invested

Improvement value = M(1-.9992^(P/L)

Whats the usual rate of peasants leaving after experiencing land loss?

40% of the amount you're above max per hour.

_________________
We can't hear the truth
When we kneel down
In front of what we think
We cannot change

demolish and build costs

_________________
I don't have a dirty mind, I have a sexy imagination. XD

Exp gain if exp over 800
xp_gain = 75 + 25000 * ln(500 / xp) / land
max 50.

Max 50? is this with no Academies im guessing?

_________________
The Age of Despair :: Round 2 :: 1 El Norte
The Age of Wisdom :: Round 4 :: 1 SmoochyWoochyPoochy
The Age of Wisdom :: Round 6 :: 1 Goblin Rings
The Age of Achievements :: Round 1 :: 1 Hufflepuff's Cup

Casualties on failed hits on the defendant side when in war :

Kylian: 2.5% of what you sent on a failed attack.


edit*
Kalle adds;
You kill 2.5% of the raw op you sent, regardless of your modds or your opponents modds, e.g. you send 80k raw op the defender losses 2k raw dp (any casualty reduction then applies to his 2k raw op, e.g. a DE with only Ghost Sentinels would lose 1.4k raw dp).
The casualties for the attacker that failed are still the base casualties, no increased casualties for failing.

_________________
We can't hear the truth
When we kneel down
In front of what we think
We cannot change

So does it mean that when i have 730 land, i will have 7% unmodified corruption (as not yet 8% because it's not 740 land...)

And if i had 1% K policing , 1% R policing and 22 court houses (3,14%), then i would have:

7 - (1+1+3.14) =
7 - 5.14 =
7 - 6 =
1 =
1% corruption

Or rather:

7.3 - (1+1+3.14) =
7.3 - 5.14 =
2.16 =
2% corruption

As i understand, rounding up goes before substracting outcome figures (1% corruption total in the example above), so it's adviced to have corruption modifier always hoovering around full figure and little fraction, like in the example above (5.14 total mods against corruption).

_________________
I can't help the above. It's just me. But the only difference between me and you is the layer of consciousness or self-awareness where mine and yours hypocrisy lies.

With 730 land of which 22 court houses, your total anti-corruption would be 1% + 1% + 2*(22/730) ~ 8.03% Remember, court houses give 2% anti-corruption for every 1% buildings, so both your examples are wrong.

It is a (pretty) safe bet that any rounding is done only at the very last step of the process rather than several times during the calculations, since it would be remarkably silly to do intermediary rounding while working on value with double digit precision, but you test it out and tell me.

So i have now 627 land which is due to grant 6% corruption

then i have 16 court houses (2.55%)x2 = 5.10
Also KD imps = .78%

this is 5.88% anti-corruption that should be long time ago rounded up
And i am still riding on 1% for quite a long time after i realised this formula here on the forums is not as beautifull as it seams.

Ofcourse out of 9 quests i did, i had only runes like 4, MABY 5 times. And i dont even have money to bring that shit to 0%. What a crap.

_________________
I can't help the above. It's just me. But the only difference between me and you is the layer of consciousness or self-awareness where mine and yours hypocrisy lies.

I know i am dumb, but could you precisise please? It really sounds like an Amphibology to me.

Look:

1)

(627/100)-(2x(16/627)+.79)

Let's say R will be rounding up after .1%
Let's say r will be showing .4% corruption as 1%

Can you please put that rounding up in it's place?

2)

a) land / 100 is the rough estimate.
b) courthouse % * 2 + K policing + R policing is used to negate corruption.
c) it also rounds up over around 0.1
d) 0.4% corruption will show and act as 1% corruption

What rounds up over around 0.1? Anti-corruption or corruption?
If 0.4% corruption show and acts as 1%, then rounding up seems to aply to anti-corruption.
And also does it mean, that when you have 3.65% anitcorruption or 3.12%, you will have 4% in both cases?

3)
And for the end i will write how do i understand what you've just quoted.


((627/100))r - ((2x(16/627)+.79))R

here r applies to raw corruption
and R to raw anticorruption

It can also be that first rounding will be R and then r:


((627/100) - ((2x(16/627)+.79))R)r

Remember Simba, some people did not play LOE long as you did

_________________
I can't help the above. It's just me. But the only difference between me and you is the layer of consciousness or self-awareness where mine and yours hypocrisy lies.

Damn you are right

But why .47?

6.27 - (5.10+.78) = 0.39 and it does not round up (in theory)

Voila! it's 0% indeed.

And where will you stick that rounding up after 0.1

In the given example, the only place where you could sensibly insert it is after the (5.10+.78) making total of 6% of anticorruption out of it,. And then the difference would be even smaller: 0.27 corruption that certainly doesnt round up!

I am getting closer to being convienced that i do not quite understand that rounding up after 0.1

Hmm. Can you clarify on the subject of misticall 'the rest of the calcs'?

_________________
I can't help the above. It's just me. But the only difference between me and you is the layer of consciousness or self-awareness where mine and yours hypocrisy lies.

It means do the calculations with the complete, unrounded decimal. Once you have the sum of corruption - anticorruption then THAT figure is rounded up to the next highest full percentage.

627/100 = 6.27% raw corruption

if you built 19 courthouses it would provide 6.06% anti-corruption
so your resultant corruption would be 6.27 - 6.06 => .21% => 1% corruption.
this corruption could be negated by investing enough in policing to give .21%.

General rule: ROUND AT THE END OF YOUR [complete] CALCULATIONS.

_________________
The empty handed painter on your street..
is drawing crazy patterns in your sheets...
The sky, too, is falling over you...
and it's all over now, Baby Blue.

This only works for 1 type of unit push:
*Spy on eco to see total population
*FS to see total of peasants, workers, troops, slaves(?)

Total Population - Total (workers, troops(+mages and spies), peasants, slaves) = 100% accurate amount of units pushed

Thnx Kalle