|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Bairdsy1
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 02:49 |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 07:59 Posts: 1207 Location: Brighton, U.K.
|
The 9th edition sealed tournament has stalled a little while Izzy is MIA and in the meantime RAVNICA has come out. This set looks really cool, based around four 2-colour guilds.
So who would like to play a sealed deck tournament from Ravnica?
Rules will be as follows:
- Once all players are signed up, a card pool of 90 cards will be pm'ed to each player
- This is equivalent to 1 starter and 3 boosters of Ravnica (usually 1 and 2, but its a new set so Im feeling generous )
- Each player must build a deck of no less than 40 cards (including land), using only cards from their card pool, plus as many basic lands as they like
- tournament will be 4 rounds of swiss, followed by a final between top 2 players
- matches will be 1 game
- decks cannot be altered between matches
Im hoping we will get 8 players, so sign up now in this thread.
Code: LADDER: ====== PLAYER W D L B P JrEye 2 0 0 0 6 bledderag 1 0 0 0 3 geLid 1 0 0 0 3 Bairdsy1 1 0 1 0 3 Sacramento Tzar 0 0 1 1 3 Viperlord 0 0 1 1 3 Cenerae 0 0 2 0 0
ROUND 1 PAIRINGS:
Bledderag vs Cenerae (Bledderag Won)
geLid vs Bairdsy1 (geLid Won)
JrEye vs Viperlord (JrEye Won)
Sac Tzar vs bye
ROUND 2 PAIRINGS:
Bledderag vs geLid
Sac Tzar vs JrEye
Cenerae vs Bairdsy1
Viperlord vs bye
Last edited by Bairdsy1 on Thu Oct 20, 2005 08:07, edited 10 times in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Sacramento Tzar
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 03:01 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 04:57 Posts: 3912 Location: Sacramento, Ca
|
|
I'm in. This expansion looks pretty cool from what I have read and I have already read the novel for it.
_________________ http://www.imaginarydaughter.com = Funny weird webcomic that I recently found and that I think you should check out as well. Personally I can't wait to see where it goes next. PS. Thanks to LUF for making me this imaginary daughter avatar.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
JrEye
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 03:24 |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 21:03 Posts: 862 Location: Ohio
|
|
Ill get my internet tomorrow so Ill sign up
_________________ Oderint, dum Metuant.
Nam si violandum est ius, regnandi gratia violandum est.
Veni, Vedi, Vici.
Vae Victis!
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Cenerae
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 03:32 |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 23:47 Posts: 2725 Location: Anorein, City in the Sky
|
I'll play 
_________________ Anger not the dragons, for thou art crunchy and tasteth good with ketchup.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Bairdsy1
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 04:49 |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 07:59 Posts: 1207 Location: Brighton, U.K.
|
|
bump... come on... there must be more interest than that.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
bledderag
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 17:18 |
|
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 00:28 Posts: 299 Location: In front of my computer. Duh.
|
|
I suppose I'll sign up.
_________________ I'd offer to change your mind for you, but I don't have a fresh diaper.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
geLid
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 18:28 |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 20:12 Posts: 157 Location: Tampa
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Viperlord
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 19:26 |
|
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 01:32 Posts: 714 Location: My fantasy world, wit no knowledge of how I got there.
|
|
I'm in.
_________________ Deviations from perfection will be forgiven, but not permitted.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Bairdsy1
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 00:13 |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 07:59 Posts: 1207 Location: Brighton, U.K.
|
|
One more interested player would be nice, then we can have 2 groups of 4 playing round robin (3 rounds) with the winner from each group squaring off in a final.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Viperlord
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 01:38 |
|
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 01:32 Posts: 714 Location: My fantasy world, wit no knowledge of how I got there.
|
|
Let's see if I understand how round robin works. Each player plays once against every other player in the group and the winner is the player who wins the most times, right? What happens if three of the players each win twice (three players have a rock-paper-scissors situation and the other player loses all games)?
_________________ Deviations from perfection will be forgiven, but not permitted.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Bairdsy1
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 01:42 |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 07:59 Posts: 1207 Location: Brighton, U.K.
|
I quote the great wisdom of Trey Parker and Matt Stone from Baseketball.
Quote: And if no clear winner emerges from all of this, the two-man sack race will be held on consecutive Sundays until a champion can be crowned.
i.e. We will work it out if and when it happens. My guess is that those tied will play a knockout match or something similar.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Viperlord
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 19:18 |
|
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 01:32 Posts: 714 Location: My fantasy world, wit no knowledge of how I got there.
|
|
Do I understand right that the 'knockout round' would be a three-player game? That would be a very good idea, since it would be impossible to have a four-way tie in the round robin game (unless a few MtG rounds are ties) and a three-player game is almost guaranteed to have a clear winner.
So there's the solution.
_________________ Deviations from perfection will be forgiven, but not permitted.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Bairdsy1
|
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 01:50 |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 07:59 Posts: 1207 Location: Brighton, U.K.
|
|
Well... it looks like we are going to stall at 7 players, so my round robin idea isnt going to work. 6 rounds is too many and we dont have an even number to split into 2 groups.
What I suggest is the following:
3 or 4 rounds of "Swiss" followed by a final between the top 2 players
Swiss is similar to round robin except that you will not play against every other player. What will happen is this:
- for the first round pairings are done at random.
- 1 player will have a bye - this counts as a win for that player
- in the second round, people who won the first round will paired against others that won the first round wherever possible, and those that lost vs others that lost etc.
- in future rounds pairings are done between players with similar win/loss ratios wherever possible.
So would people perfer 3 or 4 rounds?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Cenerae
|
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 02:18 |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 23:47 Posts: 2725 Location: Anorein, City in the Sky
|
|
I'd prefer 4 games but don't mind either way
_________________ Anger not the dragons, for thou art crunchy and tasteth good with ketchup.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Bairdsy1
|
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 03:04 |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 07:59 Posts: 1207 Location: Brighton, U.K.
|
|
4 it is then. Ill get to work generating the card pools and the pairings for round 1.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|